People v. Coleman

190 A.D.2d 1090, 594 N.Y.S.2d 1000, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1352
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Coleman. Read the opinion of the Court — 178 A.D.2d 842

Opinion

— Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: There is no merit to defendant’s contention that she was denied a fair trial by prosecutorial misconduct. The prosecutor’s questioning of witnesses was, at times, unpolished, repetitious and leading but, in light of the overwhelming evidence against defendant and the court’s prompt corrective rulings and instructions to the jury, defendant’s right to a fair trial was not substantially prejudiced. (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Onondaga County, Gorman, J. — Grand Larceny, 4th Degree.) Present — Denman, P. J., Green, Balio, Fallon and Boehm, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Coleman, 190 A.D.2d 1090, 594 N.Y.S.2d 1000, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1352 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

190 A.D.2d 1090 (People v. Coleman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.