People v. Coleman

Appellate Court of Illinois

People v. Coleman

200 Ill. App. 610

DecidedOctober 13, 1915

StatusPublished

This text of 200 Ill. App. 610 (People v. Coleman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Coleman, 200 Ill. App. 610 (Ill. Ct. App. 1915).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. Presiding Justice Eudredge

delivered the opinion of the court.

2. Bastards, § 19*—when exact day of intercourse immaterial. It is immaterial, in bastardy proceedings, on what particular days alleged acts of intercourse took place, if, in' fact, the defendant is the father of the bastard child. 3. New trial, § 99*—when affidavit in support of new trial on ground of surprise insufficient. In bastardy proceedings where the complaint charged that the acts of intercourse took place at a certain time, but the prosecutrix testified that they took place three months earlier, affidavits in support of a motion for new trial on the ground of surprise, held insufficient. •

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Presiding Justice Eudredge

delivered the opinion of the court.

2. Bastards, § 19*—when exact day of intercourse immaterial. It is immaterial, in bastardy proceedings, on what particular days alleged acts of intercourse took place, if, in' fact, the defendant is the father of the bastard child. 3. New trial, § 99*—when affidavit in support of new trial on ground of surprise insufficient. In bastardy proceedings where the complaint charged that the acts of intercourse took place at a certain time, but the prosecutrix testified that they took place three months earlier, affidavits in support of a motion for new trial on the ground of surprise, held insufficient. •

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

200 Ill. App. 610, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-coleman-illappct-1915.