People v. Cole

267 A.D.2d 394, 700 N.Y.S.2d 741, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13116

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Cole. Read the opinion of the Court — 295 A.D.2d 360 →

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 20, 1999·Published

Opinion

—Appeal by the defen[395]*395dant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Buchter, J.), rendered October 29, 1996, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant failed to preserve for appellate review his contention that the trial court erred in barring a peremptory challenge as untimely (see, CPL 470.05 [2]).

The sentence imposed was not excessive (see, People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80). Bracken, J. P., S. Miller, Altman and Luciano, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant failed to preserve for appellate review his contention that the trial court erred in barring a peremptory challenge as untimely (see, CPL 470.05 [2]).

The sentence imposed was not excessive (see, People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80). Bracken, J. P., S. Miller, Altman and Luciano, JJ., concur.

People v. Cole, 267 A.D.2d 394, 700 N.Y.S.2d 741, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13116 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

267 A.D.2d 394 (People v. Cole) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

People v. Suitte

90 A.D.2d 80 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)

Opinion

Related