People v. Cole

96 A.D.2d 730, 465 N.Y.S.2d 85, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19310
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Cole. Read the opinion of the Court — 90 A.D.2d 27

Opinion

— Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Although the comments of the District Attorney were unprofessional and improper, because of the overwhelming proof against the defendant, the isolated nature of the remarks, and the fact that the trial court immediately instructed the jury to disregard them, we do not believe they were so prejudicial as to deprive defendant of- a fair trial (see People v Galloway, 54 NY2d 396; People v Crimmins, 36 NY2d 230; People v Patterson, 88 AD2d 694; cf. People v Mott, 94 AD2d 415). (Appeal from judgment of Supreme Court, Erie County, Marshall, J. — burglary, third degree, and another charge.) Present — Hancock, Jr., J. P., Doerr, Denman, Green and Moule,- JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Cole, 96 A.D.2d 730, 465 N.Y.S.2d 85, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19310 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1983).

96 A.D.2d 730 (People v. Cole) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Crimmins
326 N.E.2d 787 (New York Court of Appeals, 1975)
People v. Galloway
430 N.E.2d 885 (New York Court of Appeals, 1981)
People v. Patterson
88 A.D.2d 694 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)
People v. Mott
94 A.D.2d 415 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1983)