People v. Cole
This text of 538 N.E.2d 336 (People v. Cole) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[958]*958OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed and the indictment dismissed.
The court should have granted the defendant’s motion to dismiss on speedy trial grounds (CPL 30.30). Defendant’s motion challenged the People’s assertion of readiness as illusory because they were unable to produce the complainant. The sworn allegations of fact essential to support defendant’s motion were conceded by the People when they failed to submit opposition papers contesting these allegations (People v Gruden, 42 NY2d 214). Under these circumstances the court is required by statute to grant the motion (CPL 210.45 [4] [c]; see also, People v Gonzalez, 116 AD2d 735).
Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Simons, Kaye, Alexander, Titone, Hancock, Jr., and Bellacosa concur in memorandum.
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order reversed, etc.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
538 N.E.2d 336, 73 N.Y.2d 957, 540 N.Y.S.2d 984, 1989 N.Y. LEXIS 311, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-cole-ny-1989.