People v. Cole
19 N.W. 968, 54 Mich. 238, 1884 Mich. LEXIS 555
Opinion
Respondent was convicted of larceny of property exceeding twenty-five dollars in value, The offense [239]*239was committed in Oakland county and within two miles of the city of Pontiac. The circuit judge excluded evidence of the value of the property in the city of Detroit, and confined the proof to the value at the time and place when and where the larceny was committed.
There is no error in the record, and the judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Cole, 19 N.W. 968, 54 Mich. 238, 1884 Mich. LEXIS 555 (Mich. 1884).
19 N.W. 968 (People v. Cole) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Dyer
403 N.W.2d 84 (Michigan Court of Appeals, 1986)
People v. Johnson
348 N.W.2d 716 (Michigan Court of Appeals, 1984)
People v. Nichols
244 N.W.2d 335 (Michigan Court of Appeals, 1976)
State v. Shedoudy
118 P.2d 280 (New Mexico Supreme Court, 1941)
People v. Ciani
286 P. 459 (California Court of Appeal, 1930)
People v. Silbertrust
86 N.E. 203 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1908)
Burrows v. State
37 N.E. 271 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1894)