People v. Coldiron

79 Misc. 2d 338, 360 N.Y.S.2d 788
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided October 23, 1974·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Memobandum. Order unanimously reversed on the law and information reinstated.

In our opinion, the failure to place above deponent’s signature the form notice advising deponent of his criminal liability, pursuant to Penal Law (§ 210.45), did not render the verification of the information defective. While the information must be subscribed, this merely requires that deponent’s signature be at the conclusion of the statement being verified but does not require such signature to also follow the form notice. Concededly, it would be better practice to have the form notice immediately beneath the statement being verified and directly above deponent’s signature so as to forcefully call the criminal penalty for making false statements to deponent’s attention (see 1 Waxner, New York Criminal Practice, ][ 2.8). However, the placing of the notice below deponent’s signature, as done on the New York State Police form used as an information here, is sufficient to constitute a verification pursuant to CPL 100.30 (subd. 1, par. [d]).

Concur ■ — ■ Glickman, P. J., Pittoni and Fabley, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Coldiron, 79 Misc. 2d 338, 360 N.Y.S.2d 788 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1974).

79 Misc. 2d 338 (People v. Coldiron) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Sanfiel
127 Misc. 2d 922 (Criminal Court of the City of New York, 1985)
People v. Lennox
94 Misc. 2d 730 (Justice Court of Town of Greenburgh, 1978)
People v. Bromley
85 Misc. 2d 988 (New York County Courts, 1976)