People v. Colden

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Colden

167 A.D.2d 413, 562 N.Y.S.2d 449, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13623

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 13, 1990

StatusPublished

This text of 167 A.D.2d 413 (People v. Colden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Colden, 167 A.D.2d 413, 562 N.Y.S.2d 449, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13623 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1990).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Lombardo, J.), rendered July 29, 1988, convicting him of attempted murder in the second degree, assault in the first degree, robbery in the first degree, and criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant contends that the verdict sheet submitted to the jury was not proper since it did not include his defense of alibi and did not refer to the presumption of innocence. The defendant, however, did not object to the submission of the verdict sheet to the jury. His contention is therefore unpreserved for appellate review as a matter of law (see, CPL 470.05 [2]; see also, People v Lugo, 150 AD2d 502). Further, we decline to review the issue in the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction given the overwhelming evidence of the defendant’s guilt (see, People v West, 151 AD2d 526; see also, People v McKenzie, 148 AD2d 472). Thompson, J. P., Lawrence, Fiber and Ritter, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Lombardo, J.), rendered July 29, 1988, convicting him of attempted murder in the second degree, assault in the first degree, robbery in the first degree, and criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant contends that the verdict sheet submitted to the jury was not proper since it did not include his defense of alibi and did not refer to the presumption of innocence. The defendant, however, did not object to the submission of the verdict sheet to the jury. His contention is therefore unpreserved for appellate review as a matter of law (see, CPL 470.05 [2]; see also, People v Lugo, 150 AD2d 502). Further, we decline to review the issue in the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction given the overwhelming evidence of the defendant’s guilt (see, People v West, 151 AD2d 526; see also, People v McKenzie, 148 AD2d 472). Thompson, J. P., Lawrence, Fiber and Ritter, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

167 A.D.2d 413, 562 N.Y.S.2d 449, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13623, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-colden-nyappdiv-1990.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack