People v. Colbert

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedApril 24, 2026
Docket222 KA 25-00946
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of People v. Colbert (People v. Colbert) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Colbert, (N.Y. Ct. App. 2026).

Opinion

People v Colbert - 2026 NY Slip Op 02547

skip to main content

It appears you are using Adblock. Please disable Adblock to best experience our website.

Law Reporting
Bureau
Thomas J.K. Smith, State Reporter

Court Decisions Resources About

People v Colbert

2026 NY Slip Op 02547

April 24, 2026

Appellate Division, Fourth Department

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This decision is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,

v

ANTHONY COLBERT, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Supreme Court of the State of New York, Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

Decided on April 24, 2026

222 KA 25-00946

Present: Lindley, J.P., Curran, Ogden, Delconte, And Hannah, JJ.

JULIE CIANCA, PUBLIC DEFENDER, ROCHESTER (CLEA WEISS OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

PERRY DUCKLES, ACTING DISTRICT ATTORNEY, ROCHESTER (MERIDETH H. SMITH OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.

Appeal from an order of the Monroe County Court (Douglas A. Randall, J.), entered April 2, 2025. The order determined that defendant is a level three risk pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act.

[*1]

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from an order determining, inter alia, that he is a level three risk pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law § 168 et seq.). We reject defendant's contention that County Court abused its discretion when it denied his request for a downward departure from his presumptive risk level. We conclude, after "weighing the aggravating and mitigating factors" at the third step of the downward departure analysis, that the totality of the circumstances does not warrant a downward departure (People v Gillotti, 23 NY3d 841, 861 [2014]; see People v Allis, 229 AD3d 1375, 1376 [4th Dept 2024]).

Entered: April 24, 2026

Ann Dillon Flynn

Clerk of the Court

Court Decisions

All Court Decisions Official Reports Service Bound Volumes Decision Search

Resources

RSS Feeds Style Manual Citation Tools Opinion Formatting & Privacy Guidelines Opinion Selection Criteria Legal Research Portal Site Index

About

About the Law Reporting Bureau About our Operations Contact Us Twitter

Quick Contact Info

17 Lodge Street

Albany, NY 12207

Phone: (518) 453-6900

Links to or from other sites do not signify endorsement or relationship with them.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI