People v. Colbert

181 N.Y.S.3d 500, 2023 NY Slip Op 00517
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedFebruary 3, 2023
Docket25 KA 21-00940
StatusPublished

This text of 181 N.Y.S.3d 500 (People v. Colbert) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Colbert, 181 N.Y.S.3d 500, 2023 NY Slip Op 00517 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2023).

Opinion

People v Colbert (2023 NY Slip Op 00517)
People v Colbert
2023 NY Slip Op 00517
Decided on February 3, 2023
Appellate Division, Fourth Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on February 3, 2023 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., LINDLEY, CURRAN, BANNISTER, AND MONTOUR, JJ.

25 KA 21-00940

[*1]THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,

v

ADAM J. COLBERT, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.


KEEM APPEALS, PLLC, SYRACUSE (BRADLEY E. KEEM OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

GREGORY S. OAKES, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, OSWEGO (AMY L. HALLENBECK OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.



Appeal from a judgment of the Oswego County Court (Walter W. Hafner, Jr., J.), rendered January 7, 2021. The judgment convicted defendant upon a plea of guilty of driving while intoxicated, as a class E felony.

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of driving while intoxicated as a class E felony (Vehicle and Traffic Law §§ 1192 [3]; 1193 [1] [c] [i]), defendant contends that his waiver of the right to appeal is invalid and that his sentence is unduly harsh and severe. Even assuming, arguendo, that defendant's waiver of the right to appeal is invalid and therefore does not preclude our review of his challenge to the severity of the sentence (see People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 256 [2006]; People v Henry, 207 AD3d 1062, 1062-1063 [4th Dept 2022], lv denied 39 NY3d 940 [2022]), we conclude that the sentence is not unduly harsh or severe.

Entered: February 3, 2023

Ann Dillon Flynn

Clerk of the Court



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Lopez
844 N.E.2d 1145 (New York Court of Appeals, 2006)
People v. Henry
170 N.Y.S.3d 769 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2022)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
181 N.Y.S.3d 500, 2023 NY Slip Op 00517, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-colbert-nyappdiv-2023.