People v. Colban

186 A.D.2d 8, 586 N.Y.S.2d 802, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10379

This text of 186 A.D.2d 8 (People v. Colban) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Colban, 186 A.D.2d 8, 586 N.Y.S.2d 802, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10379 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).

Opinions

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (David Stadtmauer, J.), entered May 14, 1991, dismissing the indictment, unanimously affirmed.

We agree with the motion court that the Grand Jury proceedings were compromised by the prosecutor’s unsolicited comment that defendant had elected not to testify, and attendant failure to then instruct the Grand Jury that no inference unfavorable to defendant could be drawn from his failure to approach and testify (CPL 190.30 [1]; People v Scott, 70 AD2d 601). Concur—Milonas, J. P., Ellerin, Ross and Smith, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Scott
70 A.D.2d 601 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1979)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
186 A.D.2d 8, 586 N.Y.S.2d 802, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10379, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-colban-nyappdiv-1992.