People v. Colavito
This text of 213 A.D.2d 662 (People v. Colavito) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Orange County (Paño Z. Patsalos, J.), rendered June 12, 1991, convicting him of falsifying business records in the first degree (38 [663]*663counts), grand larceny in the third degree, and official misconduct, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the People (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620, 621), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish that the defendant committed the crime of grand larceny in the third degree. Furthermore, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict was not against the weight of the evidence (see, CPL 470.15 [5]).
In addition, the defendant’s sentence is not excessive (see, People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80).
The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Mangano, P. J., Rosenblatt, Miller and Ritter, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
213 A.D.2d 662, 624 N.Y.S.2d 944, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-colavito-nyappdiv-1995.