People v. Cohen
This text of 20 N.Y.S. 854 (People v. Cohen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Common Pleas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Upon filing the district attorney’s certificate to the effect that the expenses incurred in the apprehension or recapture of the accused, and the costs and expenses incurred in the enforcement of the forfeiture, have been paid, or that there were no such costs or expenses, this application should be granted. The certificate annexed to the petition is deficient in the respect mentioned. People v. Lasher, (Com. Pl. N. Y.) 11 N. Y. Supp. 711. All concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
20 N.Y.S. 854, 2 Misc. 64, 49 N.Y. St. Rep. 921, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-cohen-nyctcompl-1892.