People v. Cohen

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Cohen

2 A.D.2d 834, 156 N.Y.S.2d 825, 1956 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4319

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 26, 1956

StatusPublished

This text of 2 A.D.2d 834 (People v. Cohen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Cohen, 2 A.D.2d 834, 156 N.Y.S.2d 825, 1956 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4319 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1956).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion to enlarge time granted on condition record is settled and filed on or before December 15,1956; that appellant file and serve his brief on or before January 15,1957, that respondent file and serve his brief on or before February 15, 1957, and argument of the appeal to be had during the March, 1957 Term of this court; respondent’s application for alternative relief denied. Memorandum: The application to extend the appellant’s time is being granted by reason of the fact that it has been impossible for the appellant to obtain the transcript of the minutes from the stenographer. The stenographer has likewise failed to comply with section 456 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. We have summoned the oficial stenographer to appear before us and have taken Ms sworn testimony. While we do not condone his delay up to date, we are satisfied after hearing his testimony that it -will require a period of 40 to 50 days for him to complete the transcript.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion to enlarge time granted on condition record is settled and filed on or before December 15,1956; that appellant file and serve his brief on or before January 15,1957, that respondent file and serve his brief on or before February 15, 1957, and argument of the appeal to be had during the March, 1957 Term of this court; respondent’s application for alternative relief denied. Memorandum: The application to extend the appellant’s time is being granted by reason of the fact that it has been impossible for the appellant to obtain the transcript of the minutes from the stenographer. The stenographer has likewise failed to comply with section 456 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. We have summoned the oficial stenographer to appear before us and have taken Ms sworn testimony. While we do not condone his delay up to date, we are satisfied after hearing his testimony that it -will require a period of 40 to 50 days for him to complete the transcript.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2 A.D.2d 834, 156 N.Y.S.2d 825, 1956 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4319, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-cohen-nyappdiv-1956.