People v. Cohen

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Cohen

241 A.D. 607

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 15, 1934

StatusPublished

This text of 241 A.D. 607 (People v. Cohen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Cohen, 241 A.D. 607 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1934).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment of conviction of the County Court of Queens county reversed on the law and the facts and a new trial ordered, on the grounds stated in People v. Sachs (post, p. 608), decided herewith, except that the testimony [608]*608with reference to the initial on the revolver was not given in this case. Lazansky, P. J., and Tompkins, J., concur; Davis, J., concurs for reversal on the grounds stated in his memorandum in People v. Sachs (post, p. 608), decided herewith; Young and Hagarty, JJ., dissent and vote to affirm.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment of conviction of the County Court of Queens county reversed on the law and the facts and a new trial ordered, on the grounds stated in People v. Sachs (post, p. 608), decided herewith, except that the testimony [608]*608with reference to the initial on the revolver was not given in this case. Lazansky, P. J., and Tompkins, J., concur; Davis, J., concurs for reversal on the grounds stated in his memorandum in People v. Sachs (post, p. 608), decided herewith; Young and Hagarty, JJ., dissent and vote to affirm.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

241 A.D. 607, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-cohen-nyappdiv-1934.