People v. Cohen

219 N.E.2d 427, 18 N.Y.2d 650, 273 N.Y.S.2d 75, 1966 N.Y. LEXIS 1218
New York Court of Appeals·Decided July 7, 1966·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Order affirmed; no opinion.

Concur: Judges Van VooRhis, Bueke, Scileppi, Beegan and Keating. Judge Fuld dissents in the following memorandum in which Chief Judge Desmond concurs: I adhere to the views I expressed in People v. Dinan (11 N Y 2d 350, 357) — that evidence should be excluded if obtained by interception of telephone communications in contravention of the Federal Communications Act, and, accordingly, vote to reverse the order appealed from.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Cohen, 219 N.E.2d 427, 18 N.Y.2d 650, 273 N.Y.S.2d 75, 1966 N.Y. LEXIS 1218 (N.Y. 1966).

219 N.E.2d 427 (People v. Cohen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Alba
104 Misc. 2d 1095 (New York Supreme Court, 1980)