Home/New York Court of Appeals/People v. Cohen

People v. Cohen

219 N.E.2d 427, 18 N.Y.2d 650, 273 N.Y.S.2d 75, 1966 N.Y. LEXIS 1218
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedJuly 7, 1966
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 219 N.E.2d 427 (People v. Cohen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Cohen, 219 N.E.2d 427, 18 N.Y.2d 650, 273 N.Y.S.2d 75, 1966 N.Y. LEXIS 1218 (N.Y. 1966).

Opinion

Order affirmed; no opinion.

Concur: Judges Van VooRhis, Bueke, Scileppi, Beegan and Keating. Judge Fuld dissents in the following memorandum in which Chief Judge Desmond concurs: I adhere to the views I expressed in People v. Dinan (11 N Y 2d 350, 357) — that evidence should be excluded if obtained by interception of telephone communications in contravention of the Federal Communications Act, and, accordingly, vote to reverse the order appealed from.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Alba
104 Misc. 2d 1095 (New York Supreme Court, 1980)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
219 N.E.2d 427, 18 N.Y.2d 650, 273 N.Y.S.2d 75, 1966 N.Y. LEXIS 1218, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-cohen-ny-1966.