People v. Cohen

31 Cal. 210
California Supreme Court·Decided July 1, 1866·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

By the Court, Sanderson, J.:

Action for taxes against defendant and certain real estate described in the assessment as “ claim to and possession of six hundred and nine acres of land in Suscol Valley, particularly described as follows,” etc.

The defendant, by way of defense, averred that the land was public land of the United States, and therefore exempt [211]*211from taxation. Plaintiff moved for judgment bn the pleadings and obtained it, and the defendant has appealed.

The land itself is not taxed, but. the defendant’s claim and right of possession is taxed. The. question presented is therefore precisely the same which we considered and determined in the case of The People v. Shearer, 30 Cal. 645. Upon the authority of that case the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Cohen, 31 Cal. 210 (Cal. 1866).

31 Cal. 210 (People v. Cohen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Connolly v. County of Orange
824 P.2d 1105 (California Supreme Court, 1992)
Olds v. Little Horse Creek Cattle Co.
140 P. 1004 (Wyoming Supreme Court, 1914)
Harvey Coal & Coke Co. v. Dillon
53 S.E. 928 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1905)
People v. The Black Diamond Coal Mining Co.
37 Cal. 54 (California Supreme Court, 1869)