People v. Coffey

191 N.E.2d 910, 13 N.Y.2d 726
New York Court of Appeals·Decided May 29, 1963·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Motion to amend remittitur granted. Return of remittitur requested and, when returned, it will be amended by adding thereto the following: Upon the appeal herein there were presented and necessarily passed upon questions under the Constitution of -the United States as follows: Appellant contended that (1) the failure to require disclosure of the name of the informant under the circumstances disclosed in the record and (2) the joint and several acts of the Federal and State police officers constituted an illegal search in violation of the Fourth Amendment and deprived him of due process in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution of the United States. The Court of Appeals held that appellant’s constitutional rights were not violated. [See 12 N Y 2d 443.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Coffey, 191 N.E.2d 910, 13 N.Y.2d 726 (N.Y. 1963).

191 N.E.2d 910 (People v. Coffey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States Ex Rel. Coffey v. Fay
234 F. Supp. 543 (S.D. New York, 1964)