People v. Cochran

2 Johns. Cas. 73
New York Supreme Court·Decided October 15, 1800·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

No circumstances attending the offence on either side being shown, the court have no criterion by which to regulate their discretion in fixing the punishment. We are therefore bound to consider it as a common offence; and, accordingly, impose a fine, of one dollar.

*Lansing, Ch. J. dissented. He was of opinion that a higher fine ought to be imposed.(

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Cochran, 2 Johns. Cas. 73 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1800).

2 Johns. Cas. 73 (People v. Cochran) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

City of Chicago v. Knobel
83 N.E. 459 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1907)
Rosenbaum v. State
33 Ala. 354 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1859)