People v. Cochran

2 Johns. Cas. 73
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedOctober 15, 1800
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 2 Johns. Cas. 73 (People v. Cochran) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Cochran, 2 Johns. Cas. 73 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1800).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

No circumstances attending the offence on either side being shown, the court have no criterion by which to regulate their discretion in fixing the punishment. We are therefore bound to consider it as a common offence; and, accordingly, impose a fine, of one dollar.

*Lansing, Ch. J. dissented. He was of opinion that a higher fine ought to be imposed.(

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

City of Chicago v. Knobel
83 N.E. 459 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1907)
Rosenbaum v. State
33 Ala. 354 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1859)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2 Johns. Cas. 73, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-cochran-nysupct-1800.