Home/New York Court of Appeals/People v. Cobenais

People v. Cobenais

354 N.E.2d 847, 39 N.Y.2d 968, 387 N.Y.S.2d 107, 1976 N.Y. LEXIS 2912
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedJuly 1, 1976
StatusPublished
Cited by19 cases

This text of 354 N.E.2d 847 (People v. Cobenais) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Cobenais, 354 N.E.2d 847, 39 N.Y.2d 968, 387 N.Y.S.2d 107, 1976 N.Y. LEXIS 2912 (N.Y. 1976).

Opinion

Memorandum. The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

Although the hospital showup was suppressed because it was impermissibly suggestive, the close and detailed observations of the defendant separately made during the course of the attacks by each of the two victims of the assaults were sufficient to provide independent bases for the subsequent in-court identifications (People v Ballott, 20 NY2d 600, 606-607; cf. Neil v Biggers, 409 US 188, 199-201).

It was also proper for the Trial Judge to deny defendant’s motion to sever the counts relating to the assault on one victim from those relating to the assault on the other. The circumstances surrounding the commission of the two crimes indicate striking similarities in their methods of execution as well as in the nature of the weapons employed, and each took place within a time span consistent with the defendant’s presence in the area where both were committed. Accordingly, there is no reason why the exercise of discretion by the trial court, affirmed as it has been by the Appellate Division, should be disturbed (People v Hetherington, 27 NY2d 242, 246; People v Peterson, 42 AD2d 937, affd 35 NY2d 659).

Chief Judge Breitel and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Cooke concur.

Order affirmed in a memorandum.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Richardson
9 A.D.3d 783 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)
People v. Moya
115 A.D.2d 769 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)
People v. Price
111 A.D.2d 568 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)
People v. Sanders
108 A.D.2d 316 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)
People v. Camacho
110 A.D.2d 844 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)
People v. Delgado
124 Misc. 2d 1040 (New York Supreme Court, 1984)
People v. Nieves
92 A.D.2d 837 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1983)
Alejandro v. Scully
529 F. Supp. 650 (S.D. New York, 1982)
People v. Moger
85 A.D.2d 610 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1981)
People v. Adams
423 N.E.2d 379 (New York Court of Appeals, 1981)
People v. De Vaughn
81 A.D.2d 924 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1981)
People v. Thomas
72 A.D.2d 910 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1979)
People v. Walker
97 Misc. 2d 171 (New York County Courts, 1978)
People v. Lloyd Winston G.
384 N.E.2d 681 (New York Court of Appeals, 1978)
People v. Suleski
58 A.D.2d 1023 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1977)
People v. Ramos
366 N.E.2d 76 (New York Court of Appeals, 1977)
People v. Jenkins
354 N.E.2d 848 (New York Court of Appeals, 1976)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
354 N.E.2d 847, 39 N.Y.2d 968, 387 N.Y.S.2d 107, 1976 N.Y. LEXIS 2912, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-cobenais-ny-1976.