People v. Cobb

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Cobb

224 A.D.2d 285, 638 N.Y.S.2d 305, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1083

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 15, 1996

StatusPublished

This text of 224 A.D.2d 285 (People v. Cobb) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Cobb, 224 A.D.2d 285, 638 N.Y.S.2d 305, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1083 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Ira Beal, J.), rendered January 4, 1994, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third and fifth degrees, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to concurrent terms of 41/2 to 9 years and 2 to 4 years, respectively, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant’s suppression motion was properly denied. The record does not support defendant’s claim that the officer tailored his testimony to meet constitutional objection (see, People v Garafolo, 44 AD2d 86, 88).

The jury verdict was not against the weight of the evidence. The police witness adequately explained any inconsistencies regarding the testimony at the hearing. Defendant’s other arguments are based on mere speculation. Concur — Murphy, P. J., Wallach, Ross, Nardelli and Tom, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Ira Beal, J.), rendered January 4, 1994, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third and fifth degrees, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to concurrent terms of 41/2 to 9 years and 2 to 4 years, respectively, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant’s suppression motion was properly denied. The record does not support defendant’s claim that the officer tailored his testimony to meet constitutional objection (see, People v Garafolo, 44 AD2d 86, 88).

The jury verdict was not against the weight of the evidence. The police witness adequately explained any inconsistencies regarding the testimony at the hearing. Defendant’s other arguments are based on mere speculation. Concur — Murphy, P. J., Wallach, Ross, Nardelli and Tom, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

224 A.D.2d 285, 638 N.Y.S.2d 305, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1083, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-cobb-nyappdiv-1996.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack