People v. Coad

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Coad

149 A.D.2d 429, 542 N.Y.S.2d 976, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4453

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 3, 1989·Published

Opinion

— Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his brief, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Goldman, J.), rendered October 2, 1986, as convicted him of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposed sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from.

By failing to specifically object during the trial, the defendant did not preserve for appellate review as a matter of law his challenges to the trial court’s charge (see, CPL 470.05 [2]). Moreover, review of these claims as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice is not warranted under the circumstances. Mangano, J. P., Lawrence, Eiber and Spatt, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his brief, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Goldman, J.), rendered October 2, 1986, as convicted him of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposed sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from.

By failing to specifically object during the trial, the defendant did not preserve for appellate review as a matter of law his challenges to the trial court’s charge (see, CPL 470.05 [2]). Moreover, review of these claims as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice is not warranted under the circumstances. Mangano, J. P., Lawrence, Eiber and Spatt, JJ., concur.

People v. Coad, 149 A.D.2d 429, 542 N.Y.S.2d 976, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4453 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1989).

Pincite

149 A.D.2d 429 (People v. Coad) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.