People v. Clesse

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Clesse

259 A.D.2d 706, 685 N.Y.S.2d 621, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2673

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 22, 1999

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 259 A.D.2d 706 (People v. Clesse) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Clesse, 259 A.D.2d 706, 685 N.Y.S.2d 621, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2673 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgpaent of the County Court, Westchester County (Angiolillo, J.), rendered June 16, 1997, convicting him of burglary in the second degree and escape in the first degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant was adjudicated and sentenced as a persistent violent felony offender pursuant to Penal Law § 70.08. Consequently, there is no merit to the defendant’s contention that the County Court erred in failing to comply with the provisions set forth in Penal Law § 70.10 (2).

The defendant’s remaining contention, which is similarly based on the purported applicability of Penal Law § 70.10 (2), is also without merit. Mangano, P. J., Santucci, Krausman and Florio, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the defendant from a judgpaent of the County Court, Westchester County (Angiolillo, J.), rendered June 16, 1997, convicting him of burglary in the second degree and escape in the first degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant was adjudicated and sentenced as a persistent violent felony offender pursuant to Penal Law § 70.08. Consequently, there is no merit to the defendant’s contention that the County Court erred in failing to comply with the provisions set forth in Penal Law § 70.10 (2).

The defendant’s remaining contention, which is similarly based on the purported applicability of Penal Law § 70.10 (2), is also without merit. Mangano, P. J., Santucci, Krausman and Florio, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

259 A.D.2d 706, 685 N.Y.S.2d 621, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2673, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-clesse-nyappdiv-1999.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack