People v. Clemens

177 A.D.2d 1053, 578 N.Y.S.2d 296, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15862
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 15, 1991·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Judgment unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed, in accordance with the following memorandum: The trial court erred in ordering that the sentence imposed on defendant’s conviction for driving while intoxicated (Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1192 [3]) be served consecutively to the sentence of aggravated unlicensed operation of a motor vehicle in the first degree (Vehicle and Traffic Law § 511 [3]; see, Penal Law § 70.25 [2]; see, People v Catone, 65 NY2d 1003; People v Coleman, 138 AD2d 963, 964). Accordingly, defendant’s sentence for driving while intoxicated is modified to run concurrently with the sentence for aggravated unlicensed operation of a motor vehicle in the first degree. (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Onondaga County, Gorman, J.—Felony Driving While Intoxicated.) Present—Callahan, A. P. J., Green, Pine, Lawton and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Clemens, 177 A.D.2d 1053, 578 N.Y.S.2d 296, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15862 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1991).

177 A.D.2d 1053 (People v. Clemens) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Richburg
287 A.D.2d 790 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)
People v. Milo
235 A.D.2d 552 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)