People v. Clay

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Clay

29 A.D.2d 891, 289 N.Y.S.2d 11, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4382

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 25, 1968

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 29 A.D.2d 891 (People v. Clay) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Clay, 29 A.D.2d 891, 289 N.Y.S.2d 11, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4382 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1968).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment of the County Court, Nassau County, rendered February 20, 1967, reversed, on the law, and new trial granted. The findings of fact below are affirmed. Defendant was convicted of manslaughter in the first degree. On the trial, the main theory of the defense was that defendant stabbed the decedent only after he was struck by a pipe wielded by the decedent. Evidence was introduced to support this theory. .The defense requested the court to charge that, if the jury find that the decedent feloniously attacked defendant, defendant was justified in standing his ground and, if necessary, striking his assailant. The trial court refused so to charge, but rather charged the jury that, before someone is justified in killing his assailant, he must retreat if he can do so and thus escape attack. Defendant duly excepted. In our opinion, the charge requested by defendant should have been given. When a person is feloniously attacked by another, he is under no duty to retreat (People v. Ligouri, 284 N. Y. 309). Beldoek, P. J., Rabin, Benjamin, Munder and Martuseello, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment of the County Court, Nassau County, rendered February 20, 1967, reversed, on the law, and new trial granted. The findings of fact below are affirmed. Defendant was convicted of manslaughter in the first degree. On the trial, the main theory of the defense was that defendant stabbed the decedent only after he was struck by a pipe wielded by the decedent. Evidence was introduced to support this theory. .The defense requested the court to charge that, if the jury find that the decedent feloniously attacked defendant, defendant was justified in standing his ground and, if necessary, striking his assailant. The trial court refused so to charge, but rather charged the jury that, before someone is justified in killing his assailant, he must retreat if he can do so and thus escape attack. Defendant duly excepted. In our opinion, the charge requested by defendant should have been given. When a person is feloniously attacked by another, he is under no duty to retreat (People v. Ligouri, 284 N. Y. 309). Beldoek, P. J., Rabin, Benjamin, Munder and Martuseello, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

29 A.D.2d 891, 289 N.Y.S.2d 11, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4382, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-clay-nyappdiv-1968.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack