People v. Clay

California Court of Appeal

People v. Clay

11 P.2d 638, 123 Cal. App. 600, 1932 Cal. App. LEXIS 982

CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal

DecidedMay 20, 1932

DocketDocket No. 1655.

StatusPublished

This text of 11 P.2d 638 (People v. Clay) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Clay, 11 P.2d 638, 123 Cal. App. 600, 1932 Cal. App. LEXIS 982 (Cal. Ct. App. 1932).

Pincite

Opinion

THE COURT.

The defendant was convicted in the Superior Court in the City and County of San Francisco of a felony, to wit: Violating the State Narcotic Act.

[1] The transcript on appeal was filed in this court on March 8, 1932. No brief has been filed in behalf of appellant. The cause was regularly placed on the calendar for oral argument on May 9, 1932. No appearance was made for appellant at the time the case was called for hearing. Pursuant to the provision of section1253 of the Penal Code, the judgment and order are affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

THE COURT.

The defendant was convicted in the Superior Court in the City and County of San Francisco of a felony, to wit: Violating the State Narcotic Act.

[1] The transcript on appeal was filed in this court on March 8, 1932. No brief has been filed in behalf of appellant. The cause was regularly placed on the calendar for oral argument on May 9, 1932. No appearance was made for appellant at the time the case was called for hearing. Pursuant to the provision of section1253 of the Penal Code, the judgment and order are affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

11 P.2d 638, 123 Cal. App. 600, 1932 Cal. App. LEXIS 982, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-clay-calctapp-1932.