People v. Clarke

55 A.D.2d 624, 389 N.Y.S.2d 141, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15356
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 13, 1976·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

by the People from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated March 30, 1976, which, after a hearing, granted defendant’s motion to suppress certain identification testimony. Order reversed, on the law and the facts, and motion denied. In the opinion of this court, the record herein contains clear and convincing evidence that any in-[625] court identification of the defendant by Clyde Banks, a prospective witness for the People, would be based upon a course of prior acquaintanceship and, therefore, would not be tainted by the admittedly suggestive pretrial identification procedure (see People v Carter, 30 NY2d 279; cf. People v Lebrón, 46 AD2d 776; People v Toro, 44 AD2d 848). Hopkins, Acting P. J., Martuscello, Cohalan, Rabin and Titone, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Clarke, 55 A.D.2d 624, 389 N.Y.S.2d 141, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15356 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

55 A.D.2d 624 (People v. Clarke) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Levy
123 A.D.2d 885 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1986)