People v. Clark

68 A.D.3d 485, 888 N.Y.2d 891
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 8, 2009·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The record supports the court’s discretionary upward departure to a level three sex offender adjudication. Defendant committed a serious sexual assault that was similar to the offense requiring registration, but that was not accounted for in the risk assessment instrument because it was a subsequent offense. This conduct demonstrates that defendant poses an increased risk to public safety, and warrants the upward departure (see People v Buss, 44 AD3d 634, 635 [2007], affd 11 NY3d 553 [2008]). Concur — Andrias, J.P., Saxe, Sweeny, Moskowitz and Abdus-Salaam, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Clark, 68 A.D.3d 485, 888 N.Y.2d 891 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2009).

68 A.D.3d 485 (People v. Clark) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Grant
83 A.D.3d 1026 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)