People v. Clark
This text of 46 A.D.2d 665 (People v. Clark) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal by defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Queens County, imposed October 18, 1972. Sentence reversed, on the law, and ease remanded to the Criminal Term for resentence in accordance with the views herein set forth. CPL 380.50 requires that the court ask the defendant whether he wishes to make a statement (People v. Gilliam, 40 A D 2d 1036; People v. Brown, 41 A D 2d 850). The statutory requirement is not satisfied by asking the defendant whether he has any legal reason why sentence should not be pronounced (People v. Cummings, 44 A D 2d 779). Hopkins, Acting P. J., Martuscello, Latham, Shapiro and Munder, JJ., concur. ;
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
46 A.D.2d 665, 359 N.Y.S.2d 843, 1974 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3984, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-clark-nyappdiv-1974.