People v. Clark
477 N.E.2d 1089, 64 N.Y.2d 938, 488 N.Y.S.2d 635, 1985 N.Y. LEXIS 16265
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.
It is unnecessary to consider whether it was proper for the police to have overheard the conversation at the defendant’s door, in view of the fact that the other information available to the police prior to their entry of the defendant’s apartment was alone sufficient to sustain the finding of probable cause (see, People v Plevy, 52 NY2d 58, 66).
Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Jasen, Meyer, Simons, Kaye and Alexander concur.
Order affirmed in a memorandum.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Clark, 477 N.E.2d 1089, 64 N.Y.2d 938, 488 N.Y.S.2d 635, 1985 N.Y. LEXIS 16265 (N.Y. 1985).
477 N.E.2d 1089 (People v. Clark) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Platis
186 A.D.2d 917 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)