People v. Clark
This text of 27 P.2d 410 (People v. Clark) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellant, together with another, was informed against for the crime of robbery, and also with having suffered two prior felony convictions. He admitted one conviction, but denied the second and entered a plea of not guilty to the information charging robbery.
The issues were submitted to a jury who returned a verdict of guilty of robbery in the first degree and found it to be true that defendant had been previously convicted of the felony, namely, a violation of the National Motor Vehicle Theft Act, a felony, and that he had served a term of imprisonment therefor in the United States penitentiary at McNeil Island.
From the judgment and from the order denying a motion for a new trial defendant appeals upon all the statutory grounds.
No appearance has been made by defendant to support his appeal, nor has any brief been filed in his *482 behalf. We have, however, examined the record and transcript of the testimony, but can find no errors of any materiality therein. The defendant was fairly tried and legally convicted.
The order and judgment are affirmed.
Thompson, J., and Plummer, J., concurred.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
27 P.2d 410, 135 Cal. App. 481, 1933 Cal. App. LEXIS 274, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-clark-calctapp-1933.