People v. Clancy
101 A.D.3d 1041, 955 N.Y.2d 531
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 19, 2012
StatusPublished
This text of 101 A.D.3d 1041 (People v. Clancy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
People v. Clancy, 101 A.D.3d 1041, 955 N.Y.2d 531 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2012).
Opinion
The defendant’s valid waiver of his right to appeal precludes appellate review of his claim that his sentence was excessive (see People v Ramos, 7 NY3d 737 [2006]; People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248 [2006]; People v Muniz, 91 NY2d 570 [1998]; People v Callahan, 80 NY2d 273 [1992]). Angiolillo, J.P., Balkin, Austin and Miller, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
People v. Muniz
696 N.E.2d 182 (New York Court of Appeals, 1998)
People v. Lopez
844 N.E.2d 1145 (New York Court of Appeals, 2006)
People v. Ramos
853 N.E.2d 222 (New York Court of Appeals, 2006)
People v. Callahan
80 N.Y.2d 273 (New York Court of Appeals, 1992)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
101 A.D.3d 1041, 955 N.Y.2d 531, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-clancy-nyappdiv-2012.