People v. Civil

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Civil

2017 NY Slip Op 5455, 152 A.D.3d 538, 54 N.Y.S.3d 874

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 5, 2017

Docket2015-12351

StatusPublished

This text of 2017 NY Slip Op 5455 (People v. Civil) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Civil, 2017 NY Slip Op 5455, 152 A.D.3d 538, 54 N.Y.S.3d 874 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Chun, J.), rendered December 2, 2015, convicting her of criminal possession of stolen property in the fourth degree, upon her plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. Assigned counsel has submitted a brief in accordance with Anders v California (386 US 738 [1967]), in which she moves for leave to withdraw as counsel for the appellant.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We are satisfied with the sufficiency of the brief filed by the defendant’s assigned counsel pursuant to Anders v California (386 US 738 [1967]), and, upon an independent review of the record, we conclude that there are no nonfrivolous issues which *539 could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is, therefore, granted (see id,.; Matter of Giovanni S. [Jasmin A.], 89 AD3d 252 [2011]; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631 [1976]; cf. People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606 [1979]).

Mastro, J.P., Hall, Cohen and Iannacci, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Chun, J.), rendered December 2, 2015, convicting her of criminal possession of stolen property in the fourth degree, upon her plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. Assigned counsel has submitted a brief in accordance with Anders v California (386 US 738 [1967]), in which she moves for leave to withdraw as counsel for the appellant.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We are satisfied with the sufficiency of the brief filed by the defendant’s assigned counsel pursuant to Anders v California (386 US 738 [1967]), and, upon an independent review of the record, we conclude that there are no nonfrivolous issues which *539 could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is, therefore, granted (see id,.; Matter of Giovanni S. [Jasmin A.], 89 AD3d 252 [2011]; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631 [1976]; cf. People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606 [1979]).

Mastro, J.P., Hall, Cohen and Iannacci, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2017 NY Slip Op 5455, 152 A.D.3d 538, 54 N.Y.S.3d 874, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-civil-nyappdiv-2017.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack