People v. Cisneros-Esteban

2020 NY Slip Op 2632, 121 N.Y.S.3d 613, 183 A.D.3d 603
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMay 6, 2020
Docket2019-01136
StatusPublished

This text of 2020 NY Slip Op 2632 (People v. Cisneros-Esteban) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Cisneros-Esteban, 2020 NY Slip Op 2632, 121 N.Y.S.3d 613, 183 A.D.3d 603 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2020).

Opinion

People v Cisneros-Esteban (2020 NY Slip Op 02632)
People v Cisneros-Esteban
2020 NY Slip Op 02632
Decided on May 6, 2020
Appellate Division, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on May 6, 2020 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
WILLIAM F. MASTRO, J.P.
JOHN M. LEVENTHAL
ROBERT J. MILLER
COLLEEN D. DUFFY
HECTOR D. LASALLE, JJ.

2019-01136

[*1]People of State of New York, respondent,

v

Jose Cisneros-Esteban, appellant.


James D. Licata, New City, NY (Lois Cappelletti of counsel), for appellant.

Thomas E. Walsh II, District Attorney, New City, NY (Carrie A. Ciganek of counsel), for respondent.



DECISION & ORDER

Appeal by the defendant from an order of the County Court, Rockland County (Kevin F. Russo, J.), dated December 11, 2018, which, after a hearing, designated him a level two sex offender pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C.

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The defendant's contention that he was entitled to a downward departure from his presumptive level two risk assessment is unpreserved for appellate review (see People v Gillotti, 23 NY3d 841, 861; People v Johnson, 11 NY3d 416, 421-422; People v Bigelow, 175 AD3d 1443, 1444; People v Moran, 148 AD3d 1189; People v Rodriguez, 136 AD3d 880, 881). In any event, the defendant's contention is without merit (see People v Moran, 148 AD3d at 1189; People v Rodriguez, 136 AD3d at 881).

Accordingly, we agree with the County Court's determination designating the defendant a level two sex offender.

MASTRO, J.P., LEVENTHAL, MILLER, DUFFY and LASALLE, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Aprilanne Agostino

Clerk of the Court



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Johnson
900 N.E.2d 930 (New York Court of Appeals, 2008)
People v. Rodriguez
136 A.D.3d 880 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)
People v. Moran
2017 NY Slip Op 2452 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)
People v. Gillotti
18 N.E.3d 701 (New York Court of Appeals, 2014)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2020 NY Slip Op 2632, 121 N.Y.S.3d 613, 183 A.D.3d 603, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-cisneros-esteban-nyappdiv-2020.