People v. Cintron

138 A.D.3d 755, 27 N.Y.S.3d 890
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 6, 2016·No. 2013-00530·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Camacho, J.), rendered December 19, 2012, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the seventh degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

*756 Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, he was properly adjudicated a second felony drug offender previously convicted of a violent felony (see Penal Law § 70.70 [4]). The defendant failed to sustain his burden of demonstrating that his previous plea of guilty was unconstitutionally obtained (see CPL 400.21 [7] [b]; People v Harris, 61 NY2d 9, 15-16 [1983]; People v Glover, 69 AD3d 877, 878 [2010]; People v Manohar, 40 AD3d 1123, 1124 [2007]). The minutes from the prior plea proceeding established that his plea of guilty to the predicate violent felony was knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently entered (see People v Manohar, 40 AD3d at 1124-1125).

Rivera, J.P, Hall, Cohen and Hinds-Radix, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Cintron, 138 A.D.3d 755, 27 N.Y.S.3d 890 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2016).

138 A.D.3d 755 (People v. Cintron) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Rivera
2020 NY Slip Op 05233 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2020)
People v. Justiniano
2020 NY Slip Op 04863 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2020)