People v. Cintron

232 A.D.2d 192, 647 N.Y.S.2d 942, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9826
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 3, 1996·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Murray Mogel, J., at hearing; Richard Carruthers, J., at jury trial and sentence), rendered February 10, 1994, convicting defendant of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 41/z to 9 years, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant’s claim that it was insufficient for the arresting officer to testify, in conclusory fashion, that defendant met a radioed description, is unpreserved and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. Were we to review it, we would find it to be without merit because the People did elicit the precise details of the radioed description itself (see, People v Torres, 224 AD2d 251, lv denied 88 NY2d 886). Defendant’s confronta[193]*193tion claim is also unpreserved (People v George, 67 NY2d 817) and, in any event, without merit. Concur—Milonas, J. P., Rosenberger, Wallach, Kupferman and Tom, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Cintron, 232 A.D.2d 192, 647 N.Y.S.2d 942, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9826 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

232 A.D.2d 192 (People v. Cintron) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Richardson
290 A.D.2d 297 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)
People v. Jones
277 A.D.2d 30 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)
People v. Vinniane
242 A.D.2d 464 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)