People v. Ciavarella

27 A.D.2d 937, 280 N.Y.S.2d 912, 1967 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4526

This text of 27 A.D.2d 937 (People v. Ciavarella) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Ciavarella, 27 A.D.2d 937, 280 N.Y.S.2d 912, 1967 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4526 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1967).

Opinion

Judgments of the Supreme Court, Queens County, rendered December 15, 1965, and January 5, 1966, reversed, on the law, and a new trial granted. The findings of fact implicit in the jury’s verdict are affirmed. Under the circumstances disclosed by this record, the admission of prejudicial testimony as to the previous identification of defendants requires a reversal of their convictions and a new trial (People v. Caserta, 19 N Y 2d 18; People v. Mantesta, 27 A D 2d 748; People v. Trowbridge, 305 N. Y. 471; People v. Hagedorny, 272 App. Div. 830). Beldock, P. J., Ughetta, Christ, Rabin and Benjamin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Trowbridge
113 N.E.2d 841 (New York Court of Appeals, 1953)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
27 A.D.2d 937, 280 N.Y.S.2d 912, 1967 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4526, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-ciavarella-nyappdiv-1967.