People v. Church

37 A.D.3d 1125, 829 N.Y.S.2d 777
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Church. Read the opinion of the Court — 31 A.D.3d 892

Opinion

Appeal from a judgment of the Cayuga County Court (Mark H. Fandrich, J.), rendered November 29, 2005. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of burglary in the second degree.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him, upon his plea of guilty, of burglary in the second degree (Penal Law § 140.25 [2]). The contention of defendant that County Court abused its discretion in accepting his plea to burglary in the second degree when his codefendants were permitted to plead guilty to burglary in the third degree does not survive his waiver of the right to appeal (see generally People v Seaberg, 74 NY2d 1 [1989]). In any event, that contention lacks merit. Present—Martoche, J.E, Smith, Centra, Lunn and Fahey, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Church, 37 A.D.3d 1125, 829 N.Y.S.2d 777 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2007).

37 A.D.3d 1125 (People v. Church) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Seaberg
541 N.E.2d 1022 (New York Court of Appeals, 1989)