People v. Chung Chu

253 A.D.2d 716, 678 N.Y.S.2d 255, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9778

This text of 253 A.D.2d 716 (People v. Chung Chu) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Chung Chu, 253 A.D.2d 716, 678 N.Y.S.2d 255, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9778 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Nicholas Figueroa, J.), rendered May 8, 1996, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of robbery in the first degree, and sentencing him to a term of 2 to 6 years, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant’s challenge to his plea is unpreserved and without merit. The totality of the plea record indicates that defendant, who was represented by counsel and assisted by a Cantonese interpreter, understood the terms of the plea agreement, including the promised sentence, and that his assent to the plea was knowing and voluntary (People v Montford, 134 AD2d 207, lv denied 70 NY2d 1009). Concur — Milonas, J. P., Rosenberger, Ellerin, Wallach and Williams, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Montford
134 A.D.2d 207 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1987)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
253 A.D.2d 716, 678 N.Y.S.2d 255, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9778, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-chung-chu-nyappdiv-1998.