People v. Chrysler
This text of 37 A.D.3d 486 (People v. Chrysler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the [487]*487ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this Court dated December 20, 2004 (People v Chrysler, 13 AD3d 550 [2004]), affirming a judgment of the County Court, Orange County, rendered September 13, 2000, and motion by the respondent to disqualify Michael H. Sussman from representing the appellant on the application for a writ of error coram nobis.
Ordered that the motion is denied; and it is further,
Ordered that the application is denied.
The appellant has failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel (see Jones v Barnes, 463 US 745 [1983]; People v Stultz, 2 NY3d 277 [2004]). Prudenti, EJ., Mastro, Krausman and Florio, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
37 A.D.3d 486, 827 N.Y.S.2d 879, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-chrysler-nyappdiv-2007.