People v. Christie
This text of 18 A.D.3d 770 (People v. Christie) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Gary, J.), rendered August 2, 2002, convicting him of robbery in the first degree (two counts), upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing (Douglass, J.), of that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress identification testimony.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant contends that it was reversible error for the hearing court to deny that branch of his omnibus motion which was to suppress identification testimony. Any error in the admission of the testimony regarding the showup that followed the defendant’s brief detention was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt in light of the overwhelming evidence of the defendant’s guilt, which included the in-court identification of the defendant by two eyewitnesses (see People v Harris, 80 NY2d 796, 798 [1992]; People v Owens, 74 NY2d 677, 678 [1989]; People v Dell, 11 AD3d 631, 632 [2004], lv denied 4 NY3d 762 [2005]). Adams, J.P., Krausman, Rivera and Fisher, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
18 A.D.3d 770, 794 N.Y.S.2d 911, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5610, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-christie-nyappdiv-2005.