People v. Christianson

2018 NY Slip Op 3893
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMay 31, 2018
Docket6711 3005/13 161/15
StatusPublished

This text of 2018 NY Slip Op 3893 (People v. Christianson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Christianson, 2018 NY Slip Op 3893 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2018).

Opinion

People v Christianson (2018 NY Slip Op 03893)
People v Christianson
2018 NY Slip Op 03893
Decided on May 31, 2018
Appellate Division, First Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on May 31, 2018
Renwick, J.P., Manzanet-Daniels, Mazzarelli, Gesmer, Oing, JJ.

6711 3005/13 161/15

[*1]The People of the State of New York, Respondent,

v

Sean Christianson, Defendant-Appellant.


Christina A. Swarns, Office of the Appellate Defender, New York (Emma L. Shreefter of counsel), for appellant.

Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (John T. Hughes of counsel), for respondent.



Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Laura A. Ward, J.), rendered September 28, 2015, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony drug offender previously convicted of a violent felony, to concurrent terms of eight years, with three years postrelease supervision, unanimously modified, as a matter of discretion in the interest

of justice, to the extent of reducing the prison sentence to concurrent terms of six years, and otherwise affirmed.

We do not find that defendant made a valid waiver of his right to appeal, and we find the sentence excessive to the extent indicated

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER

OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

ENTERED: MAY 31, 2018

CLERK



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 431
New York JUD § 431

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2018 NY Slip Op 3893, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-christianson-nyappdiv-2018.