People v. Christensen
Opinion
Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Chemung County (Danaher, Jr., J.), rendered September 28, 1992, upon a verdict convicting defendant of the crime of petit larceny.
Under the circumstances of this case, we find no reason to disturb County Court’s grant of restitution to the victim of the crime. Further, because defendant has already served the one-year sentence imposed by County Court, the issue of whether it was harsh or excessive has been rendered moot. Even if the issue of the severity of the sentence was properly before us, we would nevertheless find defendant’s arguments to be without merit.
Weiss, P. J., Crew III, Cardona, White and Casey, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
199 A.D.2d 649 (People v. Christensen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.