People v. Chisolm

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Chisolm

198 A.D.2d 109, 603 N.Y.S.2d 467, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10719

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 16, 1993

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 198 A.D.2d 109 (People v. Chisolm) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Chisolm, 198 A.D.2d 109, 603 N.Y.S.2d 467, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10719 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

—Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (William C. Donnino, J.), rendered October 10, 1991, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the fourth degree and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fifth degree, and sentencing him to concurrent prison terms of 41A to 9 years and 2 to 4 years, respectively, unanimously affirmed.

Evidence of two uncharged crimes was properly admitted at defendant’s trial to establish possession with intent to sell 24 envelopes of PCP recovered near him when arrested (People v Alvino, 71 NY2d 233). The majority of the defendant’s claims challenging comments the prosecutor made during summation are unpreserved for appellate review (CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Medina, 53 NY2d 951, 953). Were we to review the entire summation, we would find that the comments objected to do not warrant reversal (People v Crimmins, 36 NY2d 230). Concur — Carro, J. P., Rosenberger, Kassal and Rubin, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (William C. Donnino, J.), rendered October 10, 1991, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the fourth degree and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fifth degree, and sentencing him to concurrent prison terms of 41A to 9 years and 2 to 4 years, respectively, unanimously affirmed.

Evidence of two uncharged crimes was properly admitted at defendant’s trial to establish possession with intent to sell 24 envelopes of PCP recovered near him when arrested (People v Alvino, 71 NY2d 233). The majority of the defendant’s claims challenging comments the prosecutor made during summation are unpreserved for appellate review (CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Medina, 53 NY2d 951, 953). Were we to review the entire summation, we would find that the comments objected to do not warrant reversal (People v Crimmins, 36 NY2d 230). Concur — Carro, J. P., Rosenberger, Kassal and Rubin, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

198 A.D.2d 109, 603 N.Y.S.2d 467, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10719, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-chisolm-nyappdiv-1993.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack