People v. Chisolm

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Chisolm

69 A.D.2d 867, 415 N.Y.S.2d 397, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11579

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 16, 1979

StatusPublished

This text of 69 A.D.2d 867 (People v. Chisolm) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Chisolm, 69 A.D.2d 867, 415 N.Y.S.2d 397, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11579 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1979).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered May 7, 1976, convicting him of murder in the second degree (felony murder) and manslaughter in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. Judgment modified, on the law, by reversing the conviction for manslaughter in the first degree and the sentence imposed thereon and the said count is dismissed. As so modified, judgment affirmed. We find, and the People agree, that the evidence was legally insufficient to support the conviction of manslaughter in the first degree. We find the defendant’s other contentions to be without merit. Hopkins, J. P., Damiani, Titone and Martuscello, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered May 7, 1976, convicting him of murder in the second degree (felony murder) and manslaughter in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. Judgment modified, on the law, by reversing the conviction for manslaughter in the first degree and the sentence imposed thereon and the said count is dismissed. As so modified, judgment affirmed. We find, and the People agree, that the evidence was legally insufficient to support the conviction of manslaughter in the first degree. We find the defendant’s other contentions to be without merit. Hopkins, J. P., Damiani, Titone and Martuscello, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

69 A.D.2d 867, 415 N.Y.S.2d 397, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11579, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-chisolm-nyappdiv-1979.