People v. Chilli

227 A.D.2d 103, 641 N.Y.S.2d 310, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4712
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMay 2, 1996
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 227 A.D.2d 103 (People v. Chilli) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Chilli, 227 A.D.2d 103, 641 N.Y.S.2d 310, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4712 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Juanita Bing Newton, J.), rendered July 3, 1990, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the second degree, and sentencing him to a term of 5 years to life, unanimously affirmed.

The motion court properly evaluated the factors set forth in People v Taranovich (37 NY2d 442, 444-445) in excusing the preindictment delay of 44 months. Although defendant challenges the delay in connection with the prosecution of State charges, these were inextricably intertwined with the goals and activities of a joint State-Federal investigation into defendant and several other alleged members of a crime family. The scope of the Federal investigation incorporated serious crimes, and the life of a confidential informant and undercover operatives, and the wider web of the Federal investigation would have been compromised by an early arrest in the State case and the concomitant disclosure obligations (see, People v Donovan, 141 AD2d 835, lv denied 72 NY2d 1044). The fact that the undercover aspect of the Federal investigation might have been completed within two years of the drug sale did not eliminate the continuing need of the Federal authorities to develop sources and evidence in addition to that which had been provided by undercover operatives. The record establishes that the delay was not deliberate or motivated by tactical considerations, and caused no discrete prejudice (see, People v Taranovich, supra, at 446-447; People v Cox, 188 AD2d 316, lv denied 81 NY2d 969). Concur — Murphy, P. J., Milonas, Williams, Tom and Mazzarelli, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Vernace
274 A.D.2d 595 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)
People v. Balken
269 A.D.2d 534 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
227 A.D.2d 103, 641 N.Y.S.2d 310, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4712, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-chilli-nyappdiv-1996.