People v. Childs

8 A.D.3d 116, 778 N.Y.S.2d 272, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8359
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 15, 2004·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Joan C. Sudolnik, J.), rendered January 28, 2002, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 5 to 10 years, unanimously affirmed.

The court properly exercised its discretion in admitting evidence concerning defendant’s outstanding Maryland warrant. Since police credibility was the central issue in the case, this background material was necessary to complete the narrative of events leading to defendant’s arrest and to explain the actions of the police (see People v Till, 87 NY2d 835 [1995]; see also People v Rojas, 97 NY2d 32 [2001]). The probative value of this [117]*117evidence outweighed any prejudicial effect, which was minimized by the court’s thorough limiting instructions. Concur—Tom, J.P., Saxe, Ellerin, Marlow and Catterson, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Childs, 8 A.D.3d 116, 778 N.Y.S.2d 272, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8359 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2004).

8 A.D.3d 116 (People v. Childs) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Jesmer
2024 NY Slip Op 03624 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2024)
BLOCKER, MARLO J., PEOPLE v
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015
People v. Blocker
128 A.D.3d 1483 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)