People v. Childers

560 P.2d 92, 192 Colo. 452
CourtSupreme Court of Colorado
DecidedFebruary 22, 1977
DocketNo. 27340
StatusPublished

This text of 560 P.2d 92 (People v. Childers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Colorado primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Childers, 560 P.2d 92, 192 Colo. 452 (Colo. 1977).

Opinion

Per Curiam

The district attorney brings this áppeal under section 16-12-102, C.R.S. 1973, which authorizes appeals by the prosecution on questions of [453]*453law.

The trial court granted the defendant’s motion for judgment of acquittal at the conclusion of the prosecution’s case on the felony charge of first-degree criminal trespass. The remaining charge of misdemeanor theft was dismissed after the conclusion of all the evidence when the trial court granted the defendant’s motion for judgment of acquittal as to that charge.

The district attorney challenges these acquittals and asserts that there was sufficient evidence presented to support a verdict of guilty as to each of the charges. The district attorney therefore asserts that the trial court erred, as a matter of law, in granting the defendant’s motions for acquittal as to both charges.

Only those appeals by the prosecution where the record demonstrates clearly that the evidence presented would have supported a guilty verdict, will this court disapprove the granting of a defendant’s motion for acquittal. People v. Downer, 192 Colo. 264, 557 P.2d 835 (1976); People v. Martinez, 191 Colo. 428, 553 P.2d 774 (1976); and People v. Bennett, 183 Colo. 125, 515 P.2d 466 (1973).

After our review of this record, we cannot conclude, as a matter of law, that the evidence presented meets the tests outlined in Downer, Martinez, and Bennett. The quantum and quality of the evidence here did not make it invulnerable to the motions of the defendant for acquittal as to the felony charge of first-degree criminal trespass or as to the misdemeanor charge of theft. We do not expand further on this case because any further exposition would have no precedential value.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Downer
557 P.2d 835 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1976)
People v. Martinez
553 P.2d 774 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1976)
People v. Bennett
515 P.2d 466 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1973)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
560 P.2d 92, 192 Colo. 452, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-childers-colo-1977.