People v. Chilar

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Chilar

207 A.D.2d 665, 616 N.Y.S.2d 36, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8648

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 1, 1994

StatusPublished

This text of 207 A.D.2d 665 (People v. Chilar) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Chilar, 207 A.D.2d 665, 616 N.Y.S.2d 36, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8648 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

—Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Arlene R. Silverman, J.), rendered on June 29, 1992, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of attempted robbery in the first degree, assault in the second degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to concurrent terms of imprisonment of 7 to 14 years, 3 Vi to 7 years, and 1 year, respectively, unanimously affirmed.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the People and giving them the benefit of every reasonable inference, defendant’s intent to rob the complainant was proven beyond a reasonable doubt by legally sufficient evidence (People v Smith, 79 NY2d 309, 314-315), including the complainant’s testimony that defendant searched his shirt pocket, and, finding nothing, then demanded his money, placed him in a choke hold and stabbed him in the chest (see, People v Norris, 196 AD2d 512, lv denied 82 NY2d 723; People v Pryme, 166 AD2d 324). Concur—Ellerin, J. P., Kupferman, Rubin and Nardelli, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Arlene R. Silverman, J.), rendered on June 29, 1992, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of attempted robbery in the first degree, assault in the second degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to concurrent terms of imprisonment of 7 to 14 years, 3 Vi to 7 years, and 1 year, respectively, unanimously affirmed.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the People and giving them the benefit of every reasonable inference, defendant’s intent to rob the complainant was proven beyond a reasonable doubt by legally sufficient evidence (People v Smith, 79 NY2d 309, 314-315), including the complainant’s testimony that defendant searched his shirt pocket, and, finding nothing, then demanded his money, placed him in a choke hold and stabbed him in the chest (see, People v Norris, 196 AD2d 512, lv denied 82 NY2d 723; People v Pryme, 166 AD2d 324). Concur—Ellerin, J. P., Kupferman, Rubin and Nardelli, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

207 A.D.2d 665, 616 N.Y.S.2d 36, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8648, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-chilar-nyappdiv-1994.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack