People v. Chilano

203 A.D.2d 940, 612 N.Y.S.2d 1019, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4947

This text of 203 A.D.2d 940 (People v. Chilano) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Chilano, 203 A.D.2d 940, 612 N.Y.S.2d 1019, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4947 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Opinion

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: We affirm defendant’s sentencing as a second felony offender for reasons stated in the decision at Genesee County Court, Morton, J. (see, People v Talham, 41 AD2d 354; see also, People v Burdick, 112 Misc 2d 997).

We have reviewed defendant’s sentence and find it to be neither harsh nor excessive. (Appeal from Judgment of Gene-see County Court, Morton, J. — Grand Larceny, 3rd Degree.) Present — Green, J. P., Pine, Lawton, Callahan and Boehm, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Talham
41 A.D.2d 354 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1973)
People v. Burdick
112 Misc. 2d 997 (New York County Courts, 1982)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
203 A.D.2d 940, 612 N.Y.S.2d 1019, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4947, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-chilano-nyappdiv-1994.